Should external governmental or non-governmental actors be involved in peace and state building in other countries? Why or why not?

Abstract

The issue of rebuilding a state after a civil war is a complex and contentious issue. This is particularly true when there are external factors that can either help to stabilize or destabilize a country. There is a moral and humanitarian duty on the shoulders of the international community to ensure security and stability in countries that have suffered from war and civil strife.

In some cases, circumstances have forced direct foreign intervention in these countries, contradicting a nation's sovereignty. This is considered to be one of the main challenges facing the peace-building process, raising the question as to what extent these countries should accept the assistance/and or interference of international organizations (governmental or non-governmental) in their affairs.

In this paper we will attempt to answer the question as to whether external governmental or non-governmental actors should be involved in peace and state building in other countries. This is an important and controversial question, with varying opinions on the issue. The topic is particularly contentious as it relates to certain countries that are, at present, affected by civil war.

Should external governmental or non-governmental actors be involved in peace and state building in other countries? Why or why not?